Point-by-point comparison
Jarvis vs 3Commas, Cryptohopper, Bitsgap, Pionex and TradeSanta
Every crypto bot promises results. The difference that matters is elsewhere: where your money sits, whether you can test first, and whether the number on screen is simulated or real. This table compares them point by point.
| What we compare | Jarvis | 3Commas | Cryptohopper | Bitsgap | Pionex | TradeSanta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Where your money sits | In your own Binance account, with your key | In your exchange, via API key | In your exchange, via API key | In your exchange, via API key | Deposited inside Pionex: it is the exchange | In your exchange, via API key |
| The key needs withdrawal permission | No, and we never ask for it | No | No: the platform gives no withdrawal rights to the key | No: a key with withdrawal is rejected automatically | Not applicable: it uses no API key | We found no official statement |
| You can test without risking money | Yes: the first version trades on Demo only | Yes, with US$ 10k virtual, perpetuals only | Yes: paper trading on every plan | Yes: demo mode with the same bots | A futures demo exists, but it does not work with the bots | Yes: a virtual balance to test a strategy |
| Performance numbers come labelled | Yes: sample, window and the simulated or live label on every percentage | Backtest with a stated limitation; no public audited performance | Labels Copy Bots as US$ 10k paper trading on the bot page, but the list shows profit only | Backtest labelled as reference only | Annualised return estimated from a 7-day window | We found no backtest or labelled metric |
| Signals on Telegram | Yes: it is the main channel | Yes, official notification bot | Yes, official app | We found none: Telegram is a community channel | Not as a signal channel | Not confirmed on an official page |
| Published entry price | See the plans table | US$ 15/month on promotion (normally US$ 20) | US$ 29/month, with a 3-day trial | Free with limits; paid from US$ 23/month | No monthly fee: charges a 0.05% trading fee | US$ 25/month (US$ 18 billed yearly) |
Competitor data checked on 10 October 2026 on their official pricing pages, documentation and help centres. Prices and features change: check the source before deciding.
When Jarvis makes more sense
- You want the number with its sample, window and label, instead of a bare percentage on screen.
- You want to start with alerts on Telegram only and switch on automatic execution once you trust it.
- You want to really test first, on a Demo account, with the same robot that trades for real.
- You prefer a robot that says 'the sample is small' over one that invents a pretty number.
When a competitor is the better choice
These platforms have been around for years and do things Jarvis does not. If your case is here, go with the competitor and don't look back.
3Commas
You want several bot types (grid, DCA, TradingView signals) across several exchanges, with a full terminal.
Cryptohopper
You want to copy someone else's strategy in a large, established strategy marketplace.
Bitsgap
You trade on several exchanges at once and want a single terminal with a mature grid bot.
Pionex
You don't want to deal with API keys and accept keeping the money inside the platform itself, with no monthly fee.
TradeSanta
You want many grid and DCA bots running in parallel for the lowest monthly price.
Frequently asked questions
Does Jarvis hold my money?
No. The money stays in your Binance account. Jarvis only places orders with your key, which has no withdrawal permission.
Do I have to switch on automatic execution?
No. You can use it as alerts only: the signal lands on Telegram and you decide. Automatic execution is your choice and can be switched off at any time.
Can I trade with real money already?
The first version trades on Binance Demo only, with test money. That is deliberate: we want a measured track record before touching your money.
Do you promise profit?
No, and be suspicious of anyone who does. Crypto swings and no model is right every time. What we promise is to show the number as it is.
Why do metrics show as 'being measured'?
Because a small sample is not statistics. Until there is enough measurement, we say so instead of showing a percentage that misleads.
How is this different from 3Commas and Cryptohopper?
They are broad platforms, with many bot types and a strategy marketplace. Jarvis is narrow on purpose: a few comparable models, measured the same way, with an honest label on every number.
Want to see the numbers before trusting it?
Create your account, connect Telegram and follow the signals in Demo mode.
Create a free account